We oppose withdrawal from WHO.
The January 20th Presidential Executive Order withdrawing the United States from the World Health Organization marks a loss for maternal and infant health in the U.S. and the world.
The U.S. was a founding member of the WHO, an agency of the United Nations created in 1948, and has played a major role in programs and direction, and the WHO and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have a history of working together. If the withdrawal goes through, the U.S. will no longer have access to the global health data reported by the WHO, nor to the benefits of collaboration among its 193 other member countries, and the U.S. voice in global health policy will be diminished.
The WHO has a long record of advancing evidence-based guidelines for maternal and infant health, including prenatal care, birthing practices, breastfeeding, and maternal mortality. Between 2000 and 2020, the WHO reported that the maternal mortality ratio per 100,000 live births dropped by roughly 34% worldwide, but in 2020 nearly 800 women died each day from preventable pregnancy and childbirth-related causes, a too-high statistic that the WHO continues to tackle.
Through our own work to end deaths from SIDS and SUID we see the value of holistic approaches – healthy mothers increase the chances for healthy babies, and the environments families live in affect their own health. The WHO plays a role in coordinating global responses to health emergencies such as pandemics, which directly affect maternal and infant health systems. Without WHO support, U.S. efforts could conceivably lack full coordination or early warnings.
The WHO has expressed regret over the planned departure but also hope that the US will reconsider and work with it to address issues, including greater funding parity among member countries, which will enable the partnership to continue. We also hope for a constructive outcome.